Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Content of a complete routine second trimester obstetrical ultrasound examination and report.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Cargill Y, Morin L. Content of a complete routine second trimester obstetrical ultrasound examination and report. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009 Mar;31(3):272-75. [11 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The quality of evidence (I-III) and classification of recommendations (A-E, I) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

  1. Pregnant women should be offered a routine second trimester ultrasound between 18 and 22 weeks' gestation. (II-2B)
  2. Second trimester ultrasound should screen for the number of fetuses, the gestational age, and the location of the placenta. (II-1A)
  3. Second trimester ultrasound should screen for fetal anomalies. (II-2B)

The table below shows the recommended content of the ultrasound report, but other information may be provided in such consultations.

Table: Content of a Complete Obstetrical Ultrasound Report

Category Required Information
Patient demographic information
  • Patient name, second patient identifier (birth date, hospital identifier, health insurance number)
  • Indication for consultation
  • Requesting physician/caregiver (preferably with contact information)
  • Starting date of last normal menstrual period (LNMP)
  • Examination date
  • Date of written report
  • Name of interpreting physician
Number of fetuses and indications of life
  • Presence of cardiac activity for each fetus
  • If multiple gestation: chorionicity and amnionicity should be reported
Biometry Should be reported all in millimetres or in centimetres along with equivalent estimated gestational age for:
  • Biparietal diameter
  • Head circumference
  • Abdominal circumference
  • Femur length
Should be reported in millimetres if abnormal:
  • Nuchal fold
  • Cisterna magna
  • Cerebellar diameter
  • Lateral ventricle width
Fetal anatomy Should be reported as: normal OR abnormal (with details) OR not seen, with explanation

Should be reported for:
  • Cranium
  • Cerebral ventricles, cavum septi pellucidi, the midline falx, the choroid plexus
  • Posterior fossa: cisterna magna, cerebellum
  • Face: orbits, lips
  • Spine
  • Chest
  • Cardiac four-chamber view
  • Cardiac outflow tracts
  • Heart axis
  • Cardiac situs
  • Stomach
  • Bowel
  • Kidneys
  • Bladder
  • Abdominal cord insertion
  • Number of cord vessels
  • Upper extremities and presence of hands
  • Lower extremities and presence of feet
Amniotic fluid amount Should be reported as: normal OR increased OR decreased OR absent
Placenta Position should be reported as well as relationship to the cervical os
Maternal anatomy uterus, ovaries, cervix, bladder Should be reported as:
  • Normal OR abnormal with details OR not seen

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence*

I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomized controlled trial.

II-1: Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization.

II-2: Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort (prospective or retrospective) or case-control studies, preferably from more than one center or research group.

II-3: Evidence obtained from comparisons between times or places with or without the intervention. Dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments (such as the results of treatment with penicillin in the 1940s) could also be included in this category.

III: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees.

Grades of Recommendation**

A. There is good evidence to recommend the clinical preventive action.

B. There is fair evidence to recommend the clinical preventive action.

C. The existing evidence is conflicting and does not allow to make a recommendation for or against use of the clinical preventive action; however, other factors may influence decision-making.

D. There is fair evidence to recommend against the clinical preventive action.

E. There is good evidence to recommend against the clinical preventive action.

I. There is insufficient evidence (in quantity or quality) to make a recommendation; however, other factors may influence decision-making.

*The quality of evidence reported in these guidelines has been adapted from The Evaluation of Evidence criteria described in the report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

**Recommendations included in these guidelines have been adapted from the Classification of Recommendations criteria described in the report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Cargill Y, Morin L. Content of a complete routine second trimester obstetrical ultrasound examination and report. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009 Mar;31(3):272-75. [11 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2009 Mar

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Diagnostic Imaging Committee

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Principal Authors: Yvonne Cargill, MD, Ottawa ON; Lucie Morin, MD, Montreal QC

Committee Members: Lucie Morin (Chair), MD, Montreal QC; Stephen Bly, PhD, Ottawa ON; Kimberly Butt, MD, Fredericton NB; Yvonne Cargill, MD, Ottawa ON; Nanette Denis, RDMS, CRGS, Saskatoon SK; Robert Gagnon, MD, Montreal QC; Marja Anne Hietala-Coyle, RN, Halifax NS; Kenneth Lim, MD, Vancouver BC; Annie Ouellet, MD, Sherbrooke QC; Marie-Hélène Racicot, MD, Montreal QC; Shia Salem, MD, Canadian Association of Radiologists, Toronto ON

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Disclosure statements have been received from all members of the committee.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Web site.

Print copies: Available from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, La société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada (SOGC) 780 promenade Echo Drive Ottawa, ON K1S 5R7 (Canada); Phone: 1-800-561-2416

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on August 12, 2009. The information was verified by the guideline developer on August 19, 2009.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo